UPDATE: Alan Dershowitz To Characterize Mike Lindell In Spiritual Freedom LOLsuit Towards Jan 6 Committee

Posted on


Alan Dershowitz 3This morning we informed you about Pillow CEO Mike Lindell’s razzledazzle lawsuit towards the January 6 Choose Committee.

He’s alleging {that a} subpoena for his cellphone metadata is a gross violation of his freedom of faith, as a result of “his 2020 election integrity actions are motivated, partially, by his strongly held spiritual beliefs.” Additionally the individuals who take heed to him shout about Chinese language hackers and Dominion Voting Methods and his wonderful lawsuit, which is perpetually two weeks from touchdown on the Supreme Courtroom, are additionally motived by their Christian religion. And so it’s unlawful to have a look at his telephone data.

On prime of which, Mike Lindell can be a journalist as a result of he makes motion pictures in regards to the election — however not in a Jesus manner, in a “simply the info, ma’am” manner, as a result of journalism is VRY SRS BZNS. And so he’s entitled to First Modification protections as a bona fide member of the press.

Stop rolling your eyes! This is essential Structure stuff, and in no way the ravings of a pillow pumping maniac throwing nonsense on the federal docket in hopes that one thing may stick lengthy sufficient for Republicans to take again the Home and finish the inquiry into the occasions of January 6, 2021.

Not satisfied? Properly, have a look at this. Would Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz be coming into his look in Lindell’s case if these weren’t completely legit arguments?

“I might be a constitutional advisor on the primary and fourth modification points— points I’ve litigated and written about for a few years,” Dershowitz informed Above the Legislation.

This isn’t the primary time the notable (infamous?) professor labored with Lindell. Though he didn’t enter an look, Dershowitz suggested the MyPillow CEO on his defamatory RICO countersuit towards Dominion Voting Methods.

“Bear in mind too that the First Modification doesn’t solely give Lindell the appropriate to precise his views,” Dershowitz informed Newsweek on the time. “It offers 50 million folks the appropriate to listen to his views.”

Does it, although?

And Dersh beamed into Lindell’s Election Pillowpallooza to precise his concern that Dominion was cancel culturing free speech by submitting defamation fits towards folks only for telling lies in regards to the firm and ruining its enterprise.

“The First Modification at the moment is in nice hazard,” he warned. “It’s in nice hazard from companies, from universities. It’s in nice hazard from the social media, from YouTube and from Fb and from Twitter, which are censoring sure factors of view and never different factors of view.”

The professor didn’t specify how any of those entities, with the doable exception of universities, might violate the First Modification. However maybe he’ll clarify it to us now that he’s truly showing within the on the spot lawsuit.

Or possibly he’ll simply enter into an extemporaneous soliloquy on Jeffrey Epstein’s flight logs and whether or not he was or was not carrying underpants when he obtained that therapeutic massage. Fingers crossed!

Lindell v. Pelosi [Docket via Court Listener]


Liz Dye lives in Baltimore the place she writes about legislation and politics.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.